. Annisquam is correct with regards to his comments on calibrating a binomial interest rate tree. because his comments are correct. because his comments are correct.

Swift’s functional currency is the AUD because sales are generated in AUD and the company operates within the competitive and regulatory environment of Australia. Under IFRS, when the subsidiary’s functional currency is the local currency, translations are done using the current rate method. Thus, Swift will use the current rate method for converting its financial statements.
The use of the current rate method depends on the identification of the functional currency, not on the local currency. Translations from the functional currency to the presentation currency is done using the current rate method. The local currency has an impact on translation only where it differs from the functional currency. In these cases, the translation from the local to the functional currency is done using the temporal method.
Swift’s functional currency is the AUD, not the USD, because sales are generated in AUD and the company operates within the competitive and regulatory environment of Australia. If it were the USD this answer would be correct.

. The investment committee is correct in that direct real investment will likely generate income and price appreciation, but their view on the diversification is incorrect. Real estate returns generally have low correlations with returns on other assets classes, such as stocks and bonds, and thus allow the endowment to diversify portfolio risk.
. Investors in direct real estate can expect to generate income by leasing or renting the property.
. Investors in direct real estate can expect price appreciation on the real estate investment.

. Find prices one period from the end. Value at Year 2:
0.5 × [(104/1.0450) + (104/1.0450)] + 4 = 103.522 0.5 × [(104/1.0325) + (104/1.0325)] + 4 = 104.726 0.5 × [(104/1.0235) + (104/1.0235)] + 4 = 105.612
Find prices two periods from the end. Time 1 values are the average of Time 2 dis- counted plus the coupon payment.
0.5 × [(103.522/1.0360) + (104.726/1.0360)] + 4 = 104.506
0.5 × [(104.726/1.0260) + (105.612/1.0260)] + 4 = 106.504
Find prices at Time 0. There is no coupon paid in this node.
0.5 × [(104.506/1.029) + (106.504/1.029)] = 102.532
because the discount rate used is an average across time.
because the calculation omits the 4 coupon in the last period.

. LeCompte provided all the recommended disclosures relating to potential conflicts of interest with respect to UniFlash. In addition to her small equity position in NanoMem and the firm’s market making role for NanoMem shares, LeCompte should have also disclosed the “benefit received” from NanoMem concerning the trip she took as required by Standard 2, Public Appearances. In addition, if news of the secondary offering of NanoMem had already been made public, she should have also disclosed the fact that Topaz had been appointed the lead underwriter.
LeCompte only provided recommended disclosures relating to potential conflicts of interest with respect to UniFlash.